[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110705182703.0bb9eb33@maggie>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 18:27:03 +0200
From: Michael Büsch <m@...s.ch>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Gary Zambrano <zambrano@...adcom.com>,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Pekka Pietikainen <pp@...oulu.fi>,
Florian Schirmer <jolt@...box.org>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 38102] New: BUG kmalloc-2048: Poison
overwritten
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:12:32 +0200
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Hmm... We are in a NAPI handler... There wont be a new interrupt.
>
> Plus, we do at start of b44_rx() :
>
> prod = br32(bp, B44_DMARX_STAT) & DMARX_STAT_CDMASK;
>
> So all descriptors before prod are guaranteed to be ready for host
> consume... Fact that a dma access is running on 'next descriptor' should
> be irrelevant.
>
> IMHO Peeking B44_DMARX_STAT for each packet would be a waste of time.
Yeah I think so, too. We don't need to wait for the _whole_ DMA engine
to go idle, before we can access a buffer in the ring. We just need to make sure
that the device is finished with that buffer. And we do this by reading the current
descriptor pointer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists