[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB9v_DEOhZh37aqx1qrLnrz5+tqjcjgBx-DP6M_0NkygZ1LjcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:29:51 +0400
From: Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Büsch <m@...s.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Gary Zambrano <zambrano@...adcom.com>,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Pekka Pietikainen <pp@...oulu.fi>,
Florian Schirmer <jolt@...box.org>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 38102] New: BUG kmalloc-2048: Poison overwritten
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 08:25, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Le mardi 05 juillet 2011 à 08:17 +0400, Alexey Zaytsev a écrit :
>> >
>> Check out starting at packet 302893. 383 _identical_ ACKs were sent
>> out by the b44 machine within 30 milliseconds.
>
>
> As I said, b44 driver lost at least 200 consecutive frames (source says
> recovery takes about 20 ms)
>
> TCP then do its normal job.
>
>From my understanding, after a frame is lost, TCP would be waiting for
a retransmit. Or at least, it would not be sending 400 duplicate ACKs
for the single last frame received, right? Let me run tcpdump on the
b44 side now. I'm quite sure I won't see any ACK dups leaving the
stack.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists