[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADNfBV_i6st5PD_7bJta2rUwGjzt6eBckeeEGTt4osjr_P_R+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 07:42:32 -0400
From: Chuck Hast <wchast@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
linux-hams@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: instant oops with AF_ROSE
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 06:57, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> The support for ipv4 over rose devices has been broken for as long as
> the code has existed (I went back to 2.0.x just to make sure). Try
> this:
>
> modprobe rose
> ip link set rose0 up
> ip addr add 11.0.0.3/8 dev rose0
> ping -b 11.255.255.255
>
> That should crash your box pretty well.
>
----- Text cut for bandwidth reduction-----------
It has been a while, and we were (still are I just am not active) using FPAC
we have run a lot of IP through it, and never seemed to have a issue, but
perhaps this is not quite in that area.
I am sure Bernard will see this and pitch in with more info. I am
just trying to
figure out if we are taking two different pieces here.
Here in FL I have ran both NetRom and IP over ROSE through FPAC boxes
with no issues that I can remember. FPAC is a wrapper around the rose piece.
We probably have people still doing IP inside ROSE through FPAC boxes around
the state, not sure who or where, but it would not be a surprise to me because
some use SMTP between their BBS devices.
Bernard, any comments?
--
Chuck Hast -- KP4DJT --
To paraphrase my flight instructor;
"the only dumb question is the one you DID NOT ask resulting in my going
out and having to identify your bits and pieces in the midst of torn
and twisted metal."
---
Home web site:
www.wchast.com
ZoneMinder Demo and test site
www.wchast.com/zm
Login = guest
pwd = guest
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists