[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110708200848.4529bb0c@s6510.ftrdhcpuser.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 20:08:48 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: roland@...estorage.com, johnwheffner@...il.com, mj@....cz,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ipv4: Simplify ARP hash function.
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:41:28 -0700
>
> > What about using murmur hash which has a four byte pass as well.
> > https://sites.google.com/site/murmurhash/
>
> I'm trying to avoid multiplies that are not done in hardware on some
> cpus.
>
> Right now I'm looking at one of Thomas Wang's hashes, referenced on
> Bob Jenkin's hash analysis page:
>
> u32 hashint(u32 a)
> {
> a += ~(a<<15);
> a ^= (a>>10);
> a += (a<<3);
> a ^= (a>>6);
> a += ~(a<<11);
> a ^= (a>>16);
>
> return a;
> }
>
> It's 15 instructions, and produces better entropy in the low bits of
> the result than the high bits, which is fine for how we'll use this
> thing.
Ok. but you really have sell those Sparc's while they are still
worth something on Ebay :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists