[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110711.140828.1179960343630781204.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mirqus@...il.com
Cc: roland@...estorage.com, johnwheffner@...il.com, mj@....cz,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] neigh: Store hash shift instead of mask.
From: Michaİİ Mirosİİaw <mirqus@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:58:41 +0200
> 2011/7/11 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
>> And mask the hash function result by simply shifting
>> down the "->hash_shift" most significant bits.
>>
>> Currently which bits we use is arbitrary since jhash
>> produces entropy evenly across the whole hash function
>> result.
>>
>> But soon we'll be using universal hashing functions,
>> and in those cases more entropy exists in the higher
>> bits than the lower bits, because they use multiplies.
>
> You could use some evil shift tricks to cut some instructions if you like. ;-)
If these were fast paths I would seriously consider it :-)
But they really are not.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists