netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/2] e1000e: use GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL3LdT7MjdcqoCKMGnqBuuBNy86ZDhfLsQMnaqcc=8toP_GuCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:58:46 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	greearb@...delatech.com, bruce.w.allan@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/2] e1000e: use GFP_KERNEL allocations at
 init time

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 19:45, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:40:31 -0700
>
>> On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 19:33 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>>> You can't until I put patch #1 into my tree, which adds the
>>> new interfaces used by this patch.
>>
>> I applied patch #1 to my queue as well (for testing purposes) since I
>> saw that patch #2 was dependent.  If it passes testing, I (or Bruce)
>> will just ACK patch #2, that way you can apply both patches at the same
>> time.
>
> Ok.
> --

Hmm, this patch has 4 checkpatch.pl warnings so I guess I will be
sending you an updated version of the patch (if patch #1 is fine and
gets accepted) after we finish testing.

-- 
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html