[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1310711706.13634.4.camel@ceranb.intra.cera.cz>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:35:06 +0200
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
To: Shyam Iyer <shyam.iyer.t@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, rmody@...cade.com, ddutt@...cade.com,
huangj@...cade.com, davem@...emloft.net,
Shyam Iyer <shyam_iyer@...l.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [net][bna] Separate handling of irq type flags
variable from the irq_flags request_irq variable
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 21:00 -0400, Shyam Iyer wrote:
> Commit 5f77898de17ff983ff0e2988b73a6bdf4b6f9f8b does not completely fix the problem of handling allocations with irqs disabled..
> The below patch on top of it fixes the problem completely.
The commit fixes the issue, but it does not separate enough the
'irq_flags' and the 'flags', so it is a little bit confusing. The patch
below corrects this imprecision and looks fine.
> Based on review by "Ivan Vecera" <ivecera@...hat.com>..
> "
> Small note, the root of the problem was that non-atomic allocation was requested with IRQs disabled. Your patch description does not contain wwhy were the IRQs disabled.
>
> The function bnad_mbox_irq_alloc incorrectly uses 'flags' var for two different things, 1) to save current CPU flags and 2) for request_irq
> call.
> First the spin_lock_irqsave disables the IRQs and saves _all_ CPU flags (including one that enables/disables interrupts) to 'flags'. Then the 'flags' is overwritten by 0 or 0x80 (IRQF_SHARED). Finally the spin_unlock_irqrestore should restore saved flags, but these flags are now either 0x00 or 0x80. The interrupt bit value in flags register on x86 arch is 0x100.
> This means that the interrupt bit is zero (IRQs disabled) after spin_unlock_irqrestore so the request_irq function is called with disabled interrupts.
> "
>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Iyer <shyam_iyer@...l.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bna/bnad.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bna/bnad.c b/drivers/net/bna/bnad.c
> index 44e219c..ea13605 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bna/bnad.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bna/bnad.c
> @@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ bnad_mbox_irq_alloc(struct bnad *bnad,
> struct bna_intr_info *intr_info)
> {
> int err = 0;
> - unsigned long irq_flags = 0, flags;
> + unsigned long irq_flags, flags;
> u32 irq;
> irq_handler_t irq_handler;
>
> @@ -1125,6 +1125,7 @@ bnad_mbox_irq_alloc(struct bnad *bnad,
> if (bnad->cfg_flags & BNAD_CF_MSIX) {
> irq_handler = (irq_handler_t)bnad_msix_mbox_handler;
> irq = bnad->msix_table[bnad->msix_num - 1].vector;
> + irq_flags = 0;
> intr_info->intr_type = BNA_INTR_T_MSIX;
> intr_info->idl[0].vector = bnad->msix_num - 1;
> } else {
> @@ -1135,7 +1136,6 @@ bnad_mbox_irq_alloc(struct bnad *bnad,
> /* intr_info->idl.vector = 0 ? */
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bnad->bna_lock, flags);
> - flags = irq_flags;
> sprintf(bnad->mbox_irq_name, "%s", BNAD_NAME);
>
> /*
> @@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ bnad_mbox_irq_alloc(struct bnad *bnad,
>
> BNAD_UPDATE_CTR(bnad, mbox_intr_disabled);
>
> - err = request_irq(irq, irq_handler, flags,
> + err = request_irq(irq, irq_handler, irq_flags,
> bnad->mbox_irq_name, bnad);
>
> if (err) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists