[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110716001606.528a55c8@asterix.rh>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 00:16:06 -0300
From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>
To: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2: Close device if tx_timeout reset fails
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:53:58 -0700
"Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com> wrote:
...
> To fix it, we call dev_close() if bnx2_init_nic() fails.
> One minor wrinkle to deal with is the cancel_work_sync()
> call in bnx2_close() to cancel bnx2_reset_task(). The
> call will wait forever because it is trying to cancel
> itself and the workqueue will be stuck.
>
> Since bnx2_reset_task() holds the rtnl_lock() and checks
> for netif_running() before proceeding, there is no need
> to cancel bnx2_reset_task() in bnx2_close() even if
> bnx2_close() and bnx2_reset_task() are running concurrently.
> The rtnl_lock() serializes the 2 calls.
>
> We need to move the cancel_work_sync() call to
> bnx2_remove_one() to make sure it is canceled before freeing
> the netdev struct.
It looks good. I'm traveling now, so I'll test this on Monday.
thanks,
fbl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists