[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E255234.3060408@trash.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:45:24 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Eric Leblond <eric@...it.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] netfilter: nfqueue: batch verdict support
On 03.07.2011 12:24, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> The real question hidden here is : "Should packet ids be monotonic" in
> current implementation and all future ones ?
>
> Before we accept this patch, we should make sure packets id are
> monotonic, and I am afraid its not the case right now.
>
> I suggest following patch then.
>
> [PATCH] netfilter: nfqueue: assert monotonic packet ids
>
> Packet identifier is currently setup in nfqnl_build_packet_message(),
> using one atomic_inc_return().
>
> Problem is that since several cpus might concurrently call
> nfqnl_enqueue_packet() for the same queue, we can deliver packets to
> consumer in non monotonic way (packet N+1 being delivered after packet
> N)
>
> This patch moves the packet id setup from nfqnl_build_packet_message()
> to nfqnl_enqueue_packet() to guarantee correct delivery order.
>
> This also removes one atomic operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> CC: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> CC: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
> CC: Eric Leblond <eric@...it.org>
Applied, thanks Eric.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists