[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E26C2DC.8090208@qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:58:20 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethtool: fix ethtool_get_regs() to work with zero length
registers
On 07/20/2011 02:38 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 12:18 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> cfg80211 exports zero length register size as it currently only uses
>> struct ethtool_regs.version to export struct wiphy.hw_version.
> [...]
>
> The ethtool_regs::version field represents the version of the register
> dump format. This may or may not relate to a hardware version.
>
> If you don't actually provide a register dump then don't implement this
> operation.
Then we have a problem as cfg80211 exports the hw version without any
register dumps:
static int cfg80211_get_regs_len(struct net_device *dev)
{
/* For now, return 0... */
return 0;
}
static void cfg80211_get_regs(struct net_device *dev, struct
ethtool_regs *regs,
void *data)
{
struct wireless_dev *wdev = dev->ieee80211_ptr;
regs->version = wdev->wiphy->hw_version;
regs->len = 0;
}
And this has been there a long time already. How cfg80211 should export
hw version if this is not a proper way?
Kalle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists