[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110725222010.0b284042@kryten>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:20:10 +1000
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: mjt@....msk.ru, davem@...emloft.net, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix security_socket_sendmsg() bypass problem.
Hi,
> > (I noticed samba.org address in the Cc list).
>
> That's because Anton Blanchard is author of sendmmsg() system call.
Ignore the From address - I wasn't adding sendmmsg with samba in mind.
> > When I saw recvmmsg()/sendmmsg() here, my first thought was an
> > authoritative DNS server which can read several requests at a
> > time and answer them all at once too - this way it all will go
> > to different addresses.
>
> I don't know what application wants sendmmsg(). Since users can send
> up to UIO_MAXIOV (= 1024) "struct iovec" blocks using sendmsg(), they
> will use sendmsg() rather than sendmmsg() if the destination address
> are the same.
But if an application needs to maintain packet boundaries, then sendmsg
isn't going to help is it?
> Therefore, I guess users will use sendmmsg() for sending to multiple
> different destination addresses. If so, optimization based on
> destination address will do more harm than benefit; simply passing
> nosec flag down to LSM modules (so that SELinux will skip
> sock_has_perm() call and SMACK will not skip smack_netlabel_send()
> call) will be sufficient for 3.0.x stable release.
>
> Anton, how do you want to use sendmmsg()?
I was using it for packet generation, using raw sockets.
Anton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists