[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110728084106.22166324@nehalam.ftrdhcpuser.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:41:06 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>
Cc: Nick Carter <ncarter100@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Michał Mirosław <mirqus@...il.com>,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: mask forwarding of IEEE 802 local multicast
groups
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:17:15 +0200
David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 06:33:45PM +0200, David Lamparter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 06:03:57PM +0200, David Lamparter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 04:44:50PM +0100, Nick Carter wrote:
> > > > On 12 July 2011 12:36, David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 08:27:55AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > >> I am still undecided on this. Understand the need, but don't like idea
> > > > >> of bridge behaving in non-conforming manner. Will see if IEEE 802 committee
> > > > >> has any input.
> > > > >
> > > > > The patch doesn't make the bridge behave nonconformant. The default mask
> > > > > is 0, which just keeps the old behaviour.
> >
> > P.S.: I'd like to once more stress this. In my opinion the patch should
> > be merged because it provides desireable functionality at a small cost
> > (one test, one knob) and __does not change any default behaviour__.
>
> Stephen, anything new on this?
No.
Don't like adding yet another hack user visible API which will have
to be maintained for too long. But on the other hand I don't have
a better solution at my finger tips. If better idea doesn't come
along, then we can go with yours.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists