[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F0755019414D525@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:58:03 -0700
From: "Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"bhutchings@...arflare.com" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC net-next PATCH 1/4] pci: Add flag indicating device has
been assigned by KVM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ijc@...lion.org.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 8:11 AM
> To: Rose, Gregory V; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; davem@...emloft.net;
> bhutchings@...arflare.com; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Jesse Barnes; linux-
> pci@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 1/4] pci: Add flag indicating device has
> been assigned by KVM
>
> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 15:17 -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > Device drivers that create and destroy SR-IOV virtual functions via
> > calls to pci_enable_sriov() and pci_disable_sriov can cause catastrophic
> > failures if they attempt to destroy VFs while they are assigned to
> > guest virtual machines. By adding a flag for use by the KVM module
> > to indicate that a device is assigned a device driver can check that
> > flag and avoid destroying VFs while they are assigned and avoid system
> > failures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
> > ---
> >
> > include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++
>
> I added Jesse and linux-pci to CC.
>
> > virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 2 ++
> > virt/kvm/iommu.c | 4 ++++
> > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> I suppose this would also be useful in Xen's pciback or any other system
> which does passthrough? (Konrad CC'd for pciback)
Definitely yes. Xen experiences the same issues when the PF driver is removed while VFs are assigned to guests.
>
> Is there some common lower layer we could hook this in to? (does
> iommu_attach/detach_device make sense?) Or shall we just add the flag
> manipulations to pciback as well?
[Greg Rose]
I was unaware of any common lower layers, i.e I didn't know that Xen also uses the iommu_attach/detach_device calls. It took me a week of digging around in the KVM module code just to find these hooks. Generally I stick to Ethernet device drivers and I'm not that familiar with device pass through code. I was just confronted with a problem and looking for some way to fix it.
;^)
That sounds like a good idea, let me have a look at it.
- Greg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists