[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110729164214.GI23194@fieldses.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:42:14 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Banks <gnb@...tmail.fm>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: use better NUMA affinities
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 08:04:09PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Use NUMA aware allocations to reduce latencies and increase throughput.
>
> sunrpc kthreads can use kthread_create_on_node() if pool_mode is
> "percpu" or "pernode", and svc_prepare_thread()/svc_init_buffer() can
> also take into account NUMA node affinity for memory allocations.
...
> @@ -662,14 +675,16 @@ svc_set_num_threads(struct svc_serv *serv, struct svc_pool *pool, int nrservs)
> nrservs--;
> chosen_pool = choose_pool(serv, pool, &state);
>
> - rqstp = svc_prepare_thread(serv, chosen_pool);
> + node = svc_pool_map_get_node(chosen_pool->sp_id);
> + rqstp = svc_prepare_thread(serv, chosen_pool, node);
The only correct value for the third argument there is
svc_pool_map_get_node(chosen_pool->sp_id), so let's have
svc_prepare_thread() call that itself.
Seems OK otherwise.
Any suggestions on how we should test this?
--b.
> if (IS_ERR(rqstp)) {
> error = PTR_ERR(rqstp);
> break;
> }
>
> __module_get(serv->sv_module);
> - task = kthread_create(serv->sv_function, rqstp, serv->sv_name);
> + task = kthread_create_on_node(serv->sv_function, rqstp,
> + node, serv->sv_name);
> if (IS_ERR(task)) {
> error = PTR_ERR(task);
> module_put(serv->sv_module);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists