[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1312006806.2873.74.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 08:20:06 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Rui Ueyama <rui314@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: filter: Convert the BPF VM to threaded code
Le samedi 30 juillet 2011 à 08:04 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> We can remove one branch per BPF instruction with following patch :
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 36f975f..377f3ca 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -119,16 +119,14 @@ unsigned int sk_run_filter(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> u32 tmp;
> int k;
>
> + fentry--;
> /*
> * Process array of filter instructions.
> */
> - for (;; fentry++) {
> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
> + for (;;) {
> #define K (fentry->k)
> -#else
> - const u32 K = fentry->k;
> -#endif
>
> + fentry++;
> switch (fentry->code) {
> case BPF_S_ALU_ADD_X:
> A += X;
>
>
BTW, I tried to add one unreachable() in the default: branch, and gcc
4.5.2 generates interesting code :
It still does the compare and test, but both branches ends on same
location :
348: 83 c3 08 add $0x8,%ebx
34b: 66 83 3b 37 cmpw $0x37,(%ebx)
34f: 76 07 jbe 358 <sk_run_filter+0x28>
351: 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%esi,%eiz,1),%esi
358: 0f b7 03 movzwl (%ebx),%eax
35b: ff 24 85 34 01 00 00 jmp *0x134(,%eax,4)
On a 64bit build and gcc 4.1.2, it even generates an infinite loop
730: 66 83 3b 37 cmpw $0x37,(%rbx)
734: 76 02 jbe 738 <sk_run_filter+0x28>
736: eb fe jmp 736 <sk_run_filter+0x26>
738: 0f b7 03 movzwl (%rbx),%eax
73b: ff 24 c5 00 00 00 00 jmpq *0x0(,%rax,8)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 36f975f..89221e7 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -122,13 +122,11 @@ unsigned int sk_run_filter(const struct sk_buff *skb,
/*
* Process array of filter instructions.
*/
- for (;; fentry++) {
-#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
+ fentry--;
+ for (;;) {
#define K (fentry->k)
-#else
- const u32 K = fentry->k;
-#endif
+ fentry++;
switch (fentry->code) {
case BPF_S_ALU_ADD_X:
A += X;
@@ -351,6 +349,7 @@ load_b:
continue;
}
default:
+ unreachable();
WARN_RATELIMIT(1, "Unknown code:%u jt:%u tf:%u k:%u\n",
fentry->code, fentry->jt,
fentry->jf, fentry->k);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists