netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Create a new connector proc_event for successful calls to accept.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87r55235cw.fsf@synack.fr>
Date:	Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:02:55 +0200
From:	Samir Bellabes <sam@...ack.fr>
To:	Joe Damato <joe@...ndary.com>
Cc:	zbr@...emap.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Create a new connector proc_event for successful calls to accept.

Joe Damato <joe@...ndary.com> writes:

> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> index b4f9a6c..d21a266 100644
> --- a/net/socket.c
> +++ b/net/socket.c
> @@ -1544,6 +1544,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(accept4, int, fd, struct sockaddr __user *, upeer_sockaddr,
>  			goto out_fd;
>  	}
>  
> +	proc_accept_connector(current, newsock,
> +			      (struct sockaddr *)&address, len);
> +
>  	/* File flags are not inherited via accept() unlike another OSes. */
>  
>  	fd_install(newfd, newfile);

Hi Joe,
adding a specific function here is not very suitable.
I have already proposed such a patch by adding my own hooks, then I
moved to the LSM hooks
http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg33814.html

I have rewrite the projet to directly use netlink socket (in fact
generic netlink socket) and move to a new protocol between userspace and
kernel
you can find patch here :
http://www.synack.fr/project/snet/snet.html

sam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html