netdev - Re: Fw: [Bug 39132] Starting with 3.0.0-rc6, masquerading seems to be broken.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <8A188C9C23A54337A5A276BAE29DC6E0@delorimier>
Date:	Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:09:08 -0400
From:	David Hill <hilld@...arystorm.net>
To:	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>, Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Fw: [Bug 39132] Starting with 3.0.0-rc6,
 masquerading seems to be broken.

Hello Julian,

    I'm not using TPROXY and I've used a blank firewall with only 
masquerading and reproduced the issue.
Nothing is in NAT/mangle nor OUTPUT  but the rules mentionned in the 
attached files to this bug.

 Francis Whittle  (Comment #18) has the same issue.

Thank you ,

Dave


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Julian Anastasov" <ja@....bg>
To: "Florian Mickler" <florian@...kler.org>
Cc: <hilld@...arystorm.net>; <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; "David Miller" 
<davem@...emloft.net>
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Bug 39132] Starting with 3.0.0-rc6, masquerading seems to 
be broken.


>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2011, Florian Mickler wrote:
>
>> Can someone take a look at this regression?
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:51:12 GMT
>> From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
>> To: florian@...kler.org
>> Subject: [Bug 39132] Starting with 3.0.0-rc6, masquerading seems to be
>> broken.
>>
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39132
>
> So, problem points again to
> "Fix ip_route_me_harder triggering ip_rt_bug" ? May be
> David C. Hill or Florian can provide some information, eg. is
> tproxy used, what NAT rules are used, any rules in OUTPUT
> hooks (NAT/mangle) and which packets are dropped.
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3810 - Release Date: 08/04/11
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html