netdev - Re: [RFC 0/4] [flexcan] Add support for powerpc (freescale p1010) -V5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 6 Aug 2011 06:26:22 -0500
From:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>
Cc:	socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] [flexcan] Add support for powerpc (freescale p1010)
 -V5

On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 06:06:02AM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:05:00PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> > Marc, Wolfgang or U Bhaskar,
> > 
> > This patch set should have all your comments included.
> > 
> > I did implement a very simple clock source in the p1010rdb.c file, which,
> > unfortunately, your tree will not have so please do not apply the last
> > patch in the series.  That will need to go to the powerpc folks and
> > follow the p1010rdb patch from freescale.
> > 
> > Could you please apply the first three patches to a test branch, compile
> > and test them on an arm based system?  I would like to at least feel
> > comfortable that I have not broken anything there.
> > 
> > I have tested the full set on a p1010rdb with an external PSOC based
> > can communicator.  That PSOC code has a bunch of erroneous can comms it
> > can generate, but I do not know how the developer of that code injects
> > those errors.  As a result, no error handling from the can input has been
> > tested.  I have tested both flexcan interfaces on the board and both work
> > with these patches in addition to the other p1010rdb patches not included.
> 
> ARGH!
> 
> I just did a quick look back at my git log, and I have one other patch
> earlier in the series where I committed a one-line change to flexcan.c
> which is probably very relevant to you, but not so much to me.  I removed
> the mach/clock.h which does not seem to exist for powerpc.
> 
> Can any of you tell me if that is relevant for the arm flexcan build?
> If not, does it seem reasonable to just remove it early on?

It looks like the more-nearly right thing to do is to #include
<linux/clkdev.h> but powerpc does not implement one.

Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html