[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:23:18 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
CC: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.
On 08/08/2011 05:18 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>> Our contact with Freescale would prefer that I not post that patch until
>>>> we get the OK from freescale to do so since we received it under NDA.
>>>
>>> I don't think we currently need it. I prefer dropping and cleaning up
>>> the device tree stuff as it is not needed for the P1010 anyway. If a
>>> new processor shows up with enhanced capabilities requiring
>>> configuration via device tree, we or somebody else can provide a patch.
>>> Marc, what do you think?
>>
>> I will rebase shortly and provide a newer set of patches.
>>
>> I do think powerpc does need the device tree support. That is how the flexcan_probe
>> is getting called. How would you suggest I do it otherwise?
I think Wolfgang was talking about removing the clock* attributes from
the device tree, not the device tree bindings at all.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (263 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists