[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110808162645.GT21309@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 12:26:45 -0400
From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
To: Eduard Sinelnikov <eduard.sinelnikov@...il.com>
Cc: majordomo@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: Bonding problem
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 03:00:30PM +0300, Eduard Sinelnikov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the kernel 2.6.39.3 ( /drivers/net/bond/bond_main.c).
> In the function ‘bond_xmit_roundrobin’
> The code check if the bond is active via
> ‘bond_is_active_slave(slave)’ Function call.
> Which actually checks if the slave is backup or active
> What is the meaning of slave being backup in round robin mode?
> Correct me if I wrong but in round robin every slave should send a
> packet, regardless of being active or backup.
>
> Thank you,
> Eduard
There probably is not a compelling reason to continue to have it. There
may be a reason historically, but I'm not aware what that might be at
this point. For modes other than active-backup, the value of
slave->link and slave->backup should always contain a value that
indicates the slave is up and available for transmit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists