[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:06:13 -0400
From: Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>
To: David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 802.3ad bonding brain damaged?
On 8/8/2011 3:57 AM, David Lamparter wrote:
> No, it isn't. 802.3ad/.1AX explicitly requires that no packet
> re-ordering may ever occur, which can only be guaranteed by enqueueing
> packets for one host on one TX interface. This behaviour is mandated by
> 802.1AX-2008 page 15 which reads:
Outch, that does cause a big problem for store-and-forward switching.
You basically can't split up packets from a single stream without very
careful cut-through switching, which we obviously can't do in Linux.
That seems a rather silly requirement given that higher level protocols
already deal with packet reordering. Why not an option to say stuff the
standard?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists