Date:	Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:29:38 -0500
From:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
	U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.

On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 04:19:20PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 08/08/2011 04:03 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:44:36PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >> On 08/08/2011 03:08 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> >>> On 08/08/2011 01:31 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 10:37:58AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> >>>>> On 08/06/2011 04:34 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> >>>>>> flexcan driver needs the clk_get, clk_get_rate, etc functions
> >>>>>> to work.  This patch provides the minimum functionality.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This needs some more general thoughts... apart from the question where
> >>>>> the code should go.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Like for the MSCAN on the MPC5200, the user should be *able* to select
> >>>>> an appropriate clock source and divider via DTS node properties.
> >>>>> Currently it seems, that the DTS properties must match some
> >>>>> pre-configured values, most likely set by the boot loader. Please
> >>>>> correct me if I'm wrong. For me this is generic and should go into the
> >>>>> Flexcan driver. From there, a platform specific function, e.g.
> >>>>> flexcan_set_clock() might be called.
> >>>>
> >>>> OK.  Dug a bit more.  The p1010 built-in clocksource seems to be the
> >>>> periphereal clock frequency which is system bus frequency divided
> >>>> by 2.  The clock source can not be changed, but the clock divider can
> >>>> by freezing the interface and setting the CTRL register.  This appears
> >>>> to only be done by the boot loader.  I do not see why we can not leave
> >>>
> >>> And likely Freescale's bootloader does also fixup the DTS Flexcan node.
> >>> Ah, oh, there's already someting in the mainline U-BOOT:
> >>>
> >>> commit 65bb8b060a873fa4f5188f2951081f6011259614
> >>> Author: Bhaskar Upadhaya <Bhaskar.Upadhaya@...escale.com>
> >>> Date:   Fri Mar 4 20:27:58 2011 +0530
> >>>
> >>>     powerpc/85xx: Fix up clock_freq property in CAN node of dts
> >>>
> >>>     Fix up the device tree property associated with the Flexcan clock
> >>>     frequency. This property is used to calculate the bit timing parameters
> >>>     for Flexcan.
> >>>
> >>>     Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Upadhaya <Bhaskar.Upadhaya@...escale.com>
> >>>     Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> that functionality in the boot loader and then go back to a variation
> >>>> on my earlier flexcan_clk_* patch.  Is that close to the direction you
> >>>> think we should go or have I completely misunderstood your wishes?
> >>>
> >>> The boot loader might not chose the optimum clock source and frequency,
> >>> which might even be application dependent. Therefore it would be nice to
> >>> allow the user to change it if necessary. Some CAN interfaces do even
> >>> allow to use an external clock source. The main question is where we add
> >>> that functionality. As more as I think of it, the clock interface would
> >>> not be that bad, especially if it's available.
> >>>
> >>> Furthermore, if the bootloader sets the clock source and divider, we do
> >>> not need device tree properties for it. A simply register lookup would
> >>> reveal what values are used. We may just need the input clock source.
> >>
> >> If the bootloader touches the divider _in_ the flexcan core, that would
> >> make absolutely no sense. The clock divider in the flexcan core (in the
> >> CTRL register) is the bitrate pre-scaler calculated by the bit-timing
> >> algorithm.
> >>
> >> What we need in the device tree is, from my point of view.
> >> a) the used clock source (bus clock or xtal clock)
> >> b) the frequency of that clock
> >>
> >> These problems are solved on arm via:
> >> a) bus clock is hard coded [1]
> >> b) get that clock frequency via clk_get_rate().
> > 
> > Just to make sure I understand correctly, the clk_get_rate() return
> > value comes from the device tree and a mach specific handler, right?
> > And 'mach-specific' really means what, a processor family?
> 
> I'm talking about the mainline driver, that has no device tree support.
> The clock stuff on arm currently goes like this:

What is the difference between device tree support and the clkdev based
clock sources using of_match to find a clock source for a particular
device.  It looks to me like those are filled in based upon device tree
information, but I _TRULY_ do not know what I am talking about.

> The driver asks for the clock related to the device. The architecture
> code has previously connected the flexcan device to an arch specific
> (i.mx25, i.mx35) clock. That clock is returned. Enable/disable/get_rate
> are working on that specific clock.

I will go and study that some more.  I did my cross-compile using
mxs_defconfig.  Is there a better config I should be using?  I typically
compile a kernel with the drivers I desire and then build my cscope
database using the files used in that build.

Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists