netdev - Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2011 08:50:02 -0500
From:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To:	U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>
Cc:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	"socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de" <socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<Devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.

On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:44:16PM +0000, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robin Holt [mailto:holt@....com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 7:06 PM
> > To: Wolfgang Grandegger
> > Cc: Robin Holt; U Bhaskar-B22300; socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de;
> > netdev@...r.kernel.org; Devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org; Marc Kleine-
> > Budde
> > Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.
> > 
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 03:03:50PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > > On 08/09/2011 02:49 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
...
> > > > How would you like to change that?  Should I add it as part of this
> > > > patch, add another patch to the series, or let you take care of it?
> > > >
> > > > Also, I assume the uboot project will need to be changed as well to
> > > > reflect the corrected name.
> > >
> > > I think you should provide patches within this series to cleanup the
> > > obsolete stuff, dts and binding doc.
> > 
> > It reads to me that the binding doc now reduces just the required
> > properties.  Should I remove the file entirely?
> [Bhaskar] I think the binding doc should atleast be present with the required properties to give the clarity
>  	    about the CAN functionality
> 		can0@...00 {
>                  compatible = "fsl,flexcan";
>                  reg = <0x1c000 0x1000>;
>                  interrupts = <48 0x2>;
>                  interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
>                  clock-frequency = <fixed by u-boot>;
>          	}; 

I am not sure what clarity we get for it.  Here it is as a work in progress:


CAN Device Tree Bindings
------------------------
2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

fsl,flexcan nodes
-----------------------
Only the required compatible-, reg- and interrupt-properties are supported.

Examples:
	can0@...00 {
		compatible = "fsl,flexcan";
		reg = <0x1c000 0x1000>;
		interrupts = <48 0x2>;
		interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
	};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html