[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1108091959250.1527@ja.ssi.bg>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:06:25 +0300 (EEST)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] neigh: reduce arp latency
Hello,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Remove the artificial HZ latency on arp resolution.
>
> Instead of firing a timer in one jiffy (up to 10 ms if HZ=100), lets
> send the ARP message immediately.
>
> @@ -957,7 +964,8 @@ int __neigh_event_send(struct neighbour *neigh, struct sk_buff *skb)
> atomic_set(&neigh->probes, neigh->parms->ucast_probes);
> neigh->nud_state = NUD_INCOMPLETE;
> neigh->updated = jiffies;
> - neigh_add_timer(neigh, now + 1);
> + neigh_add_timer(neigh, now + HZ);
To be correct with old NUD_INCOMPLETE logic may be we can use
max(neigh->parms->retrans_time, HZ/2) here instead of HZ?
> + immediate_probe = true;
> } else {
> neigh->nud_state = NUD_FAILED;
> neigh->updated = jiffies;
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists