netdev - Re: [PATCH 5/5] [powerpc] Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E419180.3090507@freescale.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2011 14:58:56 -0500
From:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To:	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
CC:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de>,
	PPC list <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] [powerpc] Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.

On 08/09/2011 02:49 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Yes. The doc for the bindings we speak about
> 
> http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.0.1/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt
> 
> sneaked into the kernel without been presented on any mailing list and
> without the corresponding driver patch.

It was posted on linuxppc-dev:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/91980/

Though I agree it should have been posted more widely.

> OK, just
> 
>   "fsl,p1010-flexcan"
> 
> or
> 
>   "fsl,p1010-flexcan", "fsl,flexcan"

I'm ok with the latter, if there's enough in common that it's
conceivable that a driver wouldn't care.  The more specific compatible
will be there if the driver wants to make use of it later.

-Scot

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html