[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9C64B7751C3BCA41B64A68E23005A7BE1BEFCE@039-SN1MPN1-004.039d.mgd.msft.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:34:59 +0000
From: U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
CC: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de" <socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Kleine-Budde [mailto:mkl@...gutronix.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 1:43 PM
> To: U Bhaskar-B22300
> Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger; socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.
>
> On 08/09/2011 09:57 AM, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
> >> On 08/08/2011 05:33 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> >>>> ACK - The device tree bindings as in mainline's Documentation is a
> >> mess.
> >>>> If the powerpc guys are happy with a clock interfaces based
> >>>> approach somewhere in arch/ppc, I'm more than happy to remove:
> >>>> - fsl,flexcan-clock-source (not implemented, even in the fsl
> >>>> driver)
>
> > [Bhaskar]I have pushed the FlexCAN series of patches, It contains the
> > usage of all the fields posted in the FlexCAN bindings at
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-3.0.y.git;a=blo
> > b;f=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt;h=1a729f
> > 089866259ef82d0db5893ff7a8c54d5ccf;hb=94ed5b4788a7cdbe68bc7cb8516972cb
> > ebdc8274
>
> I've commented the patches. They are in a very bad shape. Please test
> Robin's patches.
>
> >>>>
> >>>> - fsl,flexcan-clock-divider \__ replace with code in arch/ppc, or
> >>>> - clock-frequency / a single clock-frequency attribute
> >>>
> >>> In the "net-next-2.6" tree there is also:
> >>>
> >>> $ grep flexcan arch/powerpc/boots/dts/*.dts
> >>> p1010rdb.dts: fsl,flexcan-clock-source =
> "platform";
> >>> p1010rdb.dts: fsl,flexcan-clock-source =
> "platform";
> >>> p1010si.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,flexcan-v1.0";
> >>> p1010si.dtsi: fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>;
> >>> p1010si.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,flexcan-v1.0";
> >>> p1010si.dtsi: fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>;
> >>>
> >>> Especially the fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>; might make people
> >>> think, that they could set something else.
> >>
> > [Bhaskar] As it is mentioned in the Flexcan bindings, the need of
> > fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>; But I kept it as "2" because FlexCan
> > clock source is the platform clock and it is CCB/2 If the "2" is
> > misleading, the bindings can be changed or some text can be written to
> > make the meaning of "2" Understandable , Please suggest ..
>
> The clock devider is crap. Why not specify the clockrate that goes into
> the flexcan core?
[Bhaskar] The reason why I placed the "fsl,flexcan-clock-divider" property is just because the earlier implementations
Of CAN also follows the same approach. Please see below the approach of mscan.
compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-mscan";
interrupts = <13 0x8>;
interrupt-parent = <&ipic>;
reg = <0x1380 0x80>;
fsl,mscan-clock-source = "ref";
fsl,mscan-clock-divider = <3>;
};
If you want we can remove the fsl,flexcan-clock-divider property. Please comment ..
>
> cheers, Marc
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
> Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists