netdev - Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] powerpc: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E42C196.7030708@freescale.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:36:22 -0500
From:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
CC:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	<socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	PPC list <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] powerpc: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.

On 08/10/2011 12:19 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 08/10/2011 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>> -CPI Clock- Can Protocol Interface Clock
>>> -	This CLK_SRC bit of CTRL(control register) selects the clock source to
>>> -	the CAN Protocol Interface(CPI) to be either the peripheral clock
>>> -	(driven by the PLL) or the crystal oscillator clock. The selected clock
>>> -	is the one fed to the prescaler to generate the Serial Clock (Sclock).
>>> -	The PRESDIV field of CTRL(control register) controls a prescaler that
>>> -	generates the Serial Clock (Sclock), whose period defines the
>>> -	time quantum used to compose the CAN waveform.
>>> +- compatible : Should be "fsl,flexcan" and optionally
>>> +               "fsl,flexcan-<processor>"
>>
>> fsl,<processor>-flexcan, and it should not be optional, and should come
>> before "fsl,flexcan".
>>
>> Also may want to list fsl,p1010-rdb as a "canonical compatible" for
>> anything which is backwards compatible with p1010's implementation.
> 
> How do I specify 'canonical compatible'?

Something like:

  compatible: Should be "fsl,<processor>-flexcan" and "fsl,flexcan".

  An implementation should also claim any of the following compatibles
  that it is fully backwards compatible with:

  - fsl,p1010-rdb

> What would be the use of it in that implementation?

It limits the number of compatibles a driver has to care about, so you
don't need a huge ID table just to be able to figure out whether this is
a p1010-style flexcan or ARM-style.

-Scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html