[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E41D421.1000302@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:43:13 +0800
From: Rongqing Li <rongqing.li@...driver.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Security: define security_sk_getsecid.
On 08/10/2011 12:13 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 8/9/2011 12:28 AM, rongqing.li@...driver.com wrote:
>> From: Roy.Li<rongqing.li@...driver.com>
>>
>> Define security_sk_getsecid to get the security id of a sock.
>
> Why are you requesting the secid when you're just going to
> use it to get the secctx? Why not ask for that directly?
> Is there ever a case where you only want the secid?
>
Hi:
As I know, we have not method to get secctx directly.
On the most of time, we get secctx like this.
The below comes from kernel/auditsc.c
void audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
{
char *ctx = NULL;
unsigned len;
int error;
u32 sid;
security_task_getsecid(current, &sid);
if (!sid)
return;
error = security_secid_to_secctx(sid, &ctx, &len);
if (error) {
if (error != -EINVAL)
goto error_path;
return;
}
audit_log_format(ab, " subj=%s", ctx);
security_release_secctx(ctx, len);
return;
error_path:
audit_panic("error in audit_log_task_context");
return;
}
-Roy
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roy.Li<rongqing.li@...driver.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/security.h | 6 ++++++
>> security/security.c | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
>> index ebd2a53..739ac39 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/security.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
>> @@ -2560,6 +2560,7 @@ int security_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk, int family, gfp_t priority);
>> void security_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
>> void security_sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, struct sock *newsk);
>> void security_sk_classify_flow(struct sock *sk, struct flowi *fl);
>> +void security_sk_getsecid(struct sock *sk, u32 *secid);
>> void security_req_classify_flow(const struct request_sock *req, struct flowi *fl);
>> void security_sock_graft(struct sock*sk, struct socket *parent);
>> int security_inet_conn_request(struct sock *sk,
>> @@ -2701,6 +2702,11 @@ static inline void security_sk_classify_flow(struct sock *sk, struct flowi *fl)
>> {
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void security_sk_getsecid(struct sock *sk, u32 *secid)
>> +{
>> + *secid = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline void security_req_classify_flow(const struct request_sock *req, struct flowi *fl)
>> {
>> }
>> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
>> index 0e4fccf..b0e0825 100644
>> --- a/security/security.c
>> +++ b/security/security.c
>> @@ -1104,6 +1104,12 @@ void security_sk_classify_flow(struct sock *sk, struct flowi *fl)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_sk_classify_flow);
>>
>> +void security_sk_getsecid(struct sock *sk, u32 *secid)
>> +{
>> + security_ops->sk_getsecid(sk, secid);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_sk_getsecid);
>> +
>> void security_req_classify_flow(const struct request_sock *req, struct flowi *fl)
>> {
>> security_ops->req_classify_flow(req, fl);
>
>
--
Best Reagrds,
Roy | RongQing Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists