lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110810093246.GL4926@sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 04:32:46 -0500
From:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
	Sandeep Gopalpet <Sandeep.Kumar@...escale.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gianfar.c null pointer deref in gfar_start_xmit().

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:01:01AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 09 août 2011 à 08:06 -0500, Robin Holt a écrit :
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:10:13AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > Le mardi 09 août 2011 à 01:54 -0500, Robin Holt a écrit :
> > > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:44:38PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > While using the v3.0 kernel on a Freescale P1010RDB with 3 minor patches
> > > > > (None which affect gianfar.c), I get a NULL pointer deref at:
> > > > > 
> > > > > static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> > > > > {
> > > > > ...
> > > > > 	regs = tx_queue->grp->regs;
> > > > > 
> > > > > I put a BUG_ON(tx_queue->grp) just before this line and it did trip.
> > > > > I have not looked at this any more than that.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Any suggestions would be welcome.   To reproduce, all I need to do is
> > > > > a few sequences of pings.
> > > > 
> > > > I was able to reproduce this with the net-next-2.6 kernel as well.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This driver incorrectly assumes a non dense txqueue array is possible
> > > for a netdev, but its not true.
> > > 
> > > In the meantime, you could force it to use one tx_queue only.
> > > 
> > > tx_queues = (u32 *)of_get_property(np, "fsl,num_tx_queues", NULL);
> > > num_tx_qs = tx_queues ? *tx_queues : 1;
> > 
> > I fixed up the .dts file and now it works.  I have not tested the RGMII
> > interface yet so I do not know if that supports multiple queues.  I assume
> > I could find it in the documentation.  What might I be looking for?
> > 
> 
> What exact change did you in dts ?

I changed arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010si.dtsi and modified all lines that
had fsl,num_rx_queues and fsl,num_tx_queues then recompiled and rebuilt
my multi-image boot file.

It looks like my boot loader might be missing something.  The p1010
reference manual has a section 15.7.2 Multigroup Mode Initialization.
I assume that sections initialize before using multigroup mode steps are
not getting done in the boot loader.  Does that possibly sound like the
right section of the manual?

> 
> Assuming your p1010rdb is single core powerpc, I fail to see why 8
> queues should be enabled on NIC. It only increases number of interrupts
> if multiple flows are in use, and memory footprint.

Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ