[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9E280B21-544B-47AD-8FE2-34F969461129@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:46:02 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>,
socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
PPC list <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/5] [powerpc] Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.
On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 04:15 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> ...
>> Done, except the
>>> compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan", "fsl,flexcan";
>>
>> line is
>> compatible = "fsl,flexcan", "fsl,flexcan-p1010";
>
> IIRC, there order is more to less specific, e.g. for I2C:
>
> compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-i2c", "fsl-i2c"
>
> ...
>
>>> Please also correct the node names (not using the number suffix).
>>
>> So the node names should be
>> can@...00 {
>> can@...00 {
>> correct?
>
> Yes, just have a look how other node names are constructed, e.g. for
> sata, serial, rtc, etc.:
>
> $ grep serial@ *.dts
> ...
> pdm360ng.dts: serial@...00 {
> pdm360ng.dts: serial@...00 {
> pdm360ng.dts: serial@...00 {
> pdm360ng.dts: serial@...00 {
> pdm360ng.dts: serial@...00 {
> pdm360ng.dts: serial@...00 {
> pdm360ng.dts: serial@...00 {
> pdm360ng.dts: serial@...00 {
> ...
>
> Wolfgang.
Agree w/Wolfgang here, can@...00, can@...00 is what we should use.
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists