[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <634AB7A6-1CDA-41B3-8A5D-01F29EF01521@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:46:27 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>,
socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
PPC list <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] powerpc: Add flexcan device support for p1010rdb.
On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 07:01 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>
>>> I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
>>> could determine a clock frequency. The p1010 flexcan device only has
>>> an oscillator of system bus frequency divided by 2.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
>>> Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
>>> Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
>>> Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>
>>> Cc: socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
>>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
>>> Cc: PPC list <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
>>> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig | 2 +
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Makefile | 2 +
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/clock.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p1010rdb.c | 8 +++++
>>> 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/clock.c
>>
>> I dont understand how mpc85xx_clk_functions() ends up being associated with the frequency the flexcan is running at.
>
> The function mpc85xx_clk_get_rate() returns "fsl_get_sys_freq() / 2" for
> Flexcan devices.
>
>> This either seems to global or I'm missing something.
>
> This patch extends the existing Flexcan platform driver for ARM for the
> PowerPC using the device tree. Due to the nice integration of the device
> tree (of-platform) into the platform driver and devices, the difference
> are quite small (see patches 1..3). Apart from the endianess issue, only
> the clock needs to be handled in a common way. As ARM already uses the
> clk interface, we found it straight-forward to implement it for the
> P1010, or more general for the 85xx, as well, instead of using an
> additional helper function.
I see, that. What concerns me is there are numerous clocks / frequencies that exist inside a MPC85xx/P1010 SOC. The code I'm seeing does NOT seem to do anything to relate this clock JUST to the flexcan.
>> I still think the clk / freq info should be in the device tree and handled in the driver and NOT arch/powerpc platform code.
>
> If I understand you correctly, you want the boot-loader to provide the
> relevant information by fixing up the device tree, which then can be
> handled arch-independently by the driver, right?
Yes, that is part of what I want.
- k--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists