[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1108121418090.11637@aurora>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:22:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@...net.de>
To: Marc Haber <mh+netdev@...schlus.de>
cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bridge stays down until a port is added
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 08:17:06AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:06:59 +0200
> > Marc Haber <mh+netdev@...schlus.de> wrote:
> > > Is that a feature? If so, why does the interface stay pingable after
> > > removing the dummy0 interface from the bridge?
> >
> > Yes, there are no links to send a packet so it seems logical
> > that there would be no carrier.
>
> Yes, but if I can configure an IP address to the bridge I would expect
> it to be reachable even if there are no interfaces in the bridge.
> "Older" kernels used to behave like that.
For me (using kernel 3.0.0) it seems to work as I expect it:
aurora:~# brctl addbr br0
aurora:~# ifconfig br0 192.168.254.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
aurora:~# ping 192.168.254.1
PING 192.168.254.1 (192.168.254.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.254.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.087 ms
aurora:~# ifconfig br0
br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 96:e1:ba:9f:91:f9
inet addr:192.168.254.1 Bcast:192.168.254.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
The br0 interface has no carrier / is not "running", exactly like an
ethernet port without a cable.
c'ya
sven-haegar
--
Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.
- Ben F.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists