netdev - Re: Question about the drivers movement (IBM_NEW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1313115758.2057.25.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:22:38 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about the drivers movement (IBM_NEW_EMAC)

On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 19:07 -0700, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> In commit 9aa328359545 ("ehea/ibm*: Move the IBM drivers") from Dave's
> net tree, you not only move the drivers around, but you change
> CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC to CONFIG_IBM_EMAC.  Won't that mean that all the
> PowerPC configs that currently set CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC to y will no
> longer build this driver?
> 

Your right.  The defconfig's will need to be updated by the arch
maintainers.  This particular change was requested by the maintainer's
of the driver.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)