[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAELBVzA-ArFvp9MRp5ZvgsEpi4ikt9Nq=zHsNSLAOiD=TqZC=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:44:26 -0300
From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com>
To: hadi@...erus.ca, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: sch_generic: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the address of ‘noop_qdisc’ will never be NULL
With:
gcc (GCC) 4.6.1
I noticed the following warning appearing in my build:
net/sched/sch_generic.c: In function ‘dev_graft_qdisc’:
net/sched/sch_generic.c:678:2: warning: the comparison will always
evaluate as ‘true’ for the address of ‘noop_qdisc’ will never be NULL
[-Waddress]
The code in question runs:
/* ... and graft new one */
if (qdisc == NULL)
qdisc = &noop_qdisc;
dev_queue->qdisc_sleeping = qdisc;
rcu_assign_pointer(dev_queue->qdisc, &noop_qdisc);
where rcu_assign_pointer has a null check that does not apply to
noop_qdisc, which will never be null.
My question is, should that really be assigning &noop_qdisc in there?
It seems odd to assign &noop_qdisc to qdisc only if qdisc is null, and
then unconditionally assign &noop_qdisc into dev_queue->qdisc.
Should the line be:
rcu_assign_pointer(dev_queue->qdisc, qdisc);
instead?
Just curious,
--
Kevin Winchester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists