[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E493798.7010405@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:13:28 +0200
From: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>
To: eilong@...adcom.com
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Kravkov <dmitry@...adcom.com>,
Vladislav Zolotarov <vladz@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2x: suppress repeated error messages about Max BW
On 08/15/2011 02:33 PM, Eilon Greenstein wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 04:59 -0700, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>> and bnx2x_init_vn_minmax() calls bnx2x_extract_max_cfg() on the given
>> VN, so it seems that the warning can be produced for a non-current VN.
>
> You are right, only one function (the PMF) will call this code for all
> functions. But I suspect that if you have zero values, you will have
> them for all VNs - is that the case?
A tester reported getting only these 4 messages with the patch applied:
[bnx2x_extract_max_cfg:1074(eth4)]Illegal configuration detected for Max
BW on vn 2 - using 100 instead
[bnx2x_extract_max_cfg:1074(eth5)]Illegal configuration detected for Max
BW on vn 2 - using 100 instead
[bnx2x_extract_max_cfg:1074(eth6)]Illegal configuration detected for Max
BW on vn 3 - using 100 instead
[bnx2x_extract_max_cfg:1074(eth7)]Illegal configuration detected for Max
BW on vn 3 - using 100 instead
This suggests that VNs 0 and 1 had non-zero Max BW configuration.
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists