[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110817053737.GA1936@minipsycho>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:37:38 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mike.auty@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 41152] New: kernel 3.0 and above fails to
handle vlan id 0 (802.1p) packets properly without hardware acceleration
Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:09:18AM CEST, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>
>(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
>bugzilla web interface).
>
>On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:48:16 GMT
>bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41152
>>
>> Summary: kernel 3.0 and above fails to handle vlan id 0
>> (802.1p) packets properly without hardware
>> acceleration
>> Product: Networking
>> Version: 2.5
>> Kernel Version: 3.0
>> Platform: All
>> OS/Version: Linux
>> Tree: Mainline
>> Status: NEW
>> Severity: normal
>> Priority: P1
>> Component: Other
>> AssignedTo: acme@...stprotocols.net
>> ReportedBy: mike.auty@...il.com
>> Regression: Yes
>>
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I recently found that packets tagged with a vlan id of 0 are no longer received
>> on the main interface. There were no dmesg entries on the dropped packets. I
>> attempted to setup a vlan 0 interface and configure it, but couldn't
>> successfully route traffic to the device. I can recreate this on two of the
>> three networking devices I have, my guess is that the third does successfully
>> handle hardware acceleration of vlan tags.
>>
>> After a bisection this appears to be related to commit
>> bcc6d47903612c3861201cc3a866fb604f26b8b2, which seems to try to merge the
>> non-hardware accelerated and hardware accelerated code paths for handling
>> vlans. In the process, it appears vlan id 0 (802.1p) packets are no longer
>> handled correctly.
>>
>> Unfortunately I don't know the code paths well enough to figure out what's
>> going wrong, but I'd be happy to provide more information, run tests or try out
>> patches if it would help, just let me know. Thanks... 5:)
>>
>> Mike 5:)
Hi Mike. May I ask what NIC are you seeing the regression on?
It may have something to do with dev->vlangrp and ndo_vlan_add/kill_vid.
VID 0 was recently only added by the latter ones. So if driver only
depended on dev->vlangrp, 0 was not there. This was changed recently by
my "vlan cleanup" patches. It may work for you again on net-next today.
Jirka
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists