[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABjs8yWMgyyPHC1Nfgs2TZ1ixN7Khq0OimEhUhTs-Ux_9LAx5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:58:58 +0530
From: krbmit siso <krbmit@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ipsec-tools-users@...ts.sourceforge.net,
ipsec-tools-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
ikev2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
Subject: Re: protect raw sockets
Hi Timo,
Thanks for your reply .
Yes i did explore this yesterday and i was successful in sending the IKE
messages unprotected after using the below code only for UDP sockets.
int setsockopt_bypass(int fd, int family)
{
struct sadb_x_policy policy;
int level, optname;
switch (family) {
case AF_INET:
level = IPPROTO_IP;
optname = IP_IPSEC_POLICY;
break;
case AF_INET6:
level = IPPROTO_IPV6;
optname = IPV6_IPSEC_POLICY;
break;
default:
return -1;
}
memset(&policy, 0, sizeof(policy));
policy.sadb_x_policy_len = PFKEY_UNIT64(sizeof(policy));
policy.sadb_x_policy_exttype = SADB_X_EXT_POLICY;
policy.sadb_x_policy_type = IPSEC_POLICY_BYPASS;
policy.sadb_x_policy_dir = IPSEC_DIR_INBOUND;
if (setsockopt(fd, level, optname, &policy, sizeof(policy)) == -1) {
return -1;
}
policy.sadb_x_policy_dir = IPSEC_DIR_OUTBOUND;
if (setsockopt(fd, level, optname, &policy, sizeof(policy)) == -1) {
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
But i did try the same on RAW socket by setting the policy has
policy.sadb_x_policy_type = IPSEC_POLICY_ENTRUST|IPSEC_POLICY_IPSEC;
But the packet is going unprotected .
Please show some light on how to protect RAW packets if there is a Policy
matching in the SPD saying it need to be protected.
I have checked the posting there is no help on this isues , could
you please give some options , if it is possible from Application.
Thanks and Regards
Naveen
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Naveen B N (nbn) <nbn@...co.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Is there a way to enforce IPsec protection for packets sent from
> application using RAW_SOCKET.
>
> My analysis is to add a code at the raw_sendmsg() & raw_v4_input() to
> call xfrm_policy_check() ..
> Is it a good method to proceed or is there a better and smart way to
> achieve this .
>
> Hoping for some guide lines ..
>
> Thanks in advance ..
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Naveen
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists