[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E4EB516.40102@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:10:14 -0400
From: Stephen Clark <sclark46@...thlink.net>
To: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
CC: Pascal Hambourg <pascal@...uf.fr.eu.org>,
RĂ©mi Denis-Courmont
<remi@...lab.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD Which is correct.
On 08/19/2011 12:18 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 08/18/2011 06:42 AM, Stephen Clark wrote:
>
>> I guess I don't really understand what reverse path filter stuff is all
>> about, much less making it weaker.
>> But using 2 made the pings responses be seen.
>
> It's described in RFC3704. The idea is to block spoofed packets.
>
> From Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt:
>
> rp_filter - INTEGER
> 0 - No source validation.
> 1 - Strict mode as defined in RFC3704 Strict Reverse Path
> Each incoming packet is tested against the FIB and if the interface
> is not the best reverse path the packet check will fail.
> By default failed packets are discarded.
> 2 - Loose mode as defined in RFC3704 Loose Reverse Path
> Each incoming packet's source address is also tested against the FIB
> and if the source address is not reachable via any interface
> the packet check will fail.
>
> Current recommended practice in RFC3704 is to enable strict mode
> to prevent IP spoofing from DDos attacks. If using asymmetric routing
> or other complicated routing, then loose mode is recommended.
>
> The max value from conf/{all,interface}/rp_filter is used
> when doing source validation on the {interface}.
>
> Default value is 0. Note that some distributions enable it
> in startup scripts.
>
>
>
Thanks for taking the time to explain this. Much appreciated.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)
"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists