[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110819.032651.405436165608502880.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 03:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: nanditad@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, therbert@...gle.com, mattmathis@...gle.com,
ycheng@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Proportional Rate Reduction for TCP.
From: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:33:32 -0700
> @@ -2830,9 +2830,14 @@ static int tcp_try_undo_loss(struct sock *sk)
> static inline void tcp_complete_cwr(struct sock *sk)
> {
> struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
> - /* Do not moderate cwnd if it's already undone in cwr or recovery */
> - if (tp->undo_marker && tp->snd_cwnd > tp->snd_ssthresh) {
> - tp->snd_cwnd = tp->snd_ssthresh;
> +
> + /* Do not moderate cwnd if it's already undone in cwr or recovery. */
> + if (tp->undo_marker) {
> +
> + if (inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ca_state == TCP_CA_CWR)
Please get rid of that empty line before the TCP_CA_CWR case.
> + sndcnt = DIV_ROUND_UP((u64)(tp->prr_delivered *
> + tp->snd_ssthresh),
> + (u64)tp->prior_cwnd) - tp->prr_out;
This won't link on 32-bit unless __divdi3 libgcc routine is provided
by the architecture. To portably do 64-bit division you need to use
do_div() or something based upon it. Perhaps DIV_ROUND_UP_LL() will
work best in this case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists