[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1313726998.11178.10.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:09:58 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Tony Breeds <tony@...eyournoodle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix IBM EMAC driver after rename.
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 13:57 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 08:44:00PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > Don't do this :-( When you reply to me as your new version of the patch
> > it craps up the commit message.
> > Always make a fresh, new, patch posting with a clean full commit message
> > without any non-essential material included.
> > I'm not applying this, because I'm pretty sick and tired of having to
> > edit up people's patch postings when they do stuff like this.
> Sorry I thought git am coped with this.
It can if you move the quoted stuff below the
---
separator, though I don't know what patchworks
does with threaded [PATCH V2] content. I do
think it's useful when the corrected patch
is appropriately threaded.
The corrected patch email could look like:
Subject: [PATCH V2] module: description
typical multi-line patch description...
Signed-off-by: etc
---
> On some date, somebody wrote:
> quoted stuff
Description of delta between patch 1 and patch 2.
actual patch...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists