[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110821030415.18106.qmail@science.horizon.com>
Date: 20 Aug 2011 23:04:15 -0400
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@...izon.com>
To: linux@...izon.com, w@....eu
Cc: dan@...para.com, davem@...emloft.net, gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk,
herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mpm@...enic.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve sequence number generation.
>> * Should I worry about 32-bit IPv6 performance, since that's even more
>> unlikely to be running heavy loads on 32-bit hardware?
> On x86 you're probably right, but there are other very fast platforms
> such as ARM, which are used to build routers or appliances, and which
> are 32-bit and there it may matter.
Thanks for the feedback. Your point about routers is well-taken.
It's particularly x86-32 which gives me fits, but I'll keep ARM
performance in mind, too.
>> * If yes, is this fast enough to be acceptable, or do I need to work
>> harder to find more speed?
> I'd suggest that the most important is no performance regression. Probably
> that if you can bring something which brings back what we lost with MD5,
> your work would gain interest.
Okay, I'll go back to the drawing board on performance.
Damn, this is going to be tough.
> I'm copy-pasting here the memo I exchanged in private after my tests, there
> is nothing secret in it, so better post the whole explanation :
Thank you very much. It helps me figure out what the time budget is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists