[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E56942A.3080905@monom.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:27:54 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] per-containers tcp buffer limitation
Hi Chris,
On 08/25/2011 05:05 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 06:55 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>
>> I'd like to solve a use case where it is necessary to count all bytes
>> transmitted and received by an application [1]. So far I have found two
>> unsatisfying solution for it. The first one is to hook into libc and
>> count the bytes there. I don't think I have to say I don't like this.
>
> Is there any particular reason you can't use LD_PRELOAD to interpose a
> library to do the statistics monitoring?
This is certainly possible to do for any dynamic linked application. I
think it wouldn't work for static linked ones. Currently I don't know if
I have to face such application on the project I am on. The reason why I
am not so a big fan is that using the LD_PRELOAD trick seems very
hackish to me.
As Glauber has argumented in this thread, there are properly quite a few
people who want to control or monitor sockets. It seems I am one of
those. Having this kind of support in cgroups seems like a very neat
solution to me.
thanks,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists