netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: relax PKTINFO non local ipv6 udp xmit check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANP3RGcA-=uiTtCcgDnZx-Afoo15Qzktz42Zvs==+R+2Fr-avQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:51:40 -0700
From:	Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: relax PKTINFO non local ipv6 udp xmit check

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 6:06 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > Allow transparent sockets to be less restrictive about
> > the source ip of ipv6 udp packets being sent.
>
> Applied, thanks a lot.

FYI, I don't see this in either git repository:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git;a=shortlog
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git;a=shortlog

I'd expect it to have shown up in net-next by now.

I'm also curious whether anyone knows of any good reason why
transparent sockets require CAP_NET_ADMIN instead of CAP_NET_RAW (or
either one of CAP_NET_{RAW|ADMIN}).

Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html