[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9BB251C1-A211-486D-A717-59149AC3A709@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:47:19 +1200
From: Andrew McGregor <andrewmcgr@...il.com>
To: Jim Gettys <jg@...edesktop.org>
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@...ebsd.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Smith <smithm@....qualcomm.com>,
Kevin Hayes <hayes@....qualcomm.com>,
Derek Smithies <derek@...ranet.co.nz>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BQL crap and wireless
On 31/08/2011, at 1:58 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 11:42 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 30 August 2011 11:34, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> C(P) is going to be quite variable - a full frame retransmit of a 4ms
>> long aggregate frame is SUM(exponential backoff, grab the air,
>> preamble, header, 4ms, etc. for each pass.)
>>
> It's not clear to me that doing heroic measures to compute the cost is
> going to be worthwhile due to the rate at which the costs can change on
> wireless; just getting into the rough ballpark may be enough. But
> buffering algorithms and AQM algorithms are going to need an estimate of
> the *time* it will take to transmit data, more than # of bytes or packets.
That's not heroic measures; mac80211 needs all the code to calculate these times anyway, it's just a matter of collecting together some things we already know and calling the right function.
Andrew--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists