netdev - Re: BQL crap and wireless

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <903AA8A8-9ACD-44FB-9BA8-50137359EC2B@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:59:05 +1200
From:	Andrew McGregor <andrewmcgr@...il.com>
To:	Jim Gettys <jg@...edesktop.org>
Cc:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>,
	Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matt Smith <smithm@....qualcomm.com>,
	Kevin Hayes <hayes@....qualcomm.com>,
	Derek Smithies <derek@...ranet.co.nz>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BQL crap and wireless

On 30/08/2011, at 1:22 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:

> The gotcha is we don't have a AQM algorithm known to work in
> the face of the highly dynamic bandwidth variation that is wireless

It's worse than highly dynamic... the bandwidth may be completely undefined moment to moment, as it is dependent on both the wireless environment, which varies on timescales that can be about equal to a packet transmit time, and on the traffic mix.  There's about 30 ms of correlation time at best.

>  This was/is
> the great surprise to me as I had always thought of AQM as a property of
> internet routers, not hosts.

There's no distinction in the forwarding plane, every router is a host, every host is a router.

Andrew--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html