[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110831104800.60f2afa9@nehalam.ftrdhcpuser.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:48:00 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Dan McGee <dan@...hlinux.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip route: don't implicitly filter address family
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:38:33 -0500
Dan McGee <dan@...hlinux.org> wrote:
> When looking at the output of 'ip route show' on an IPv6 capable
> machine, the default output doesn't show IPv6 routes. This is unlike any
> other ip subcommand, which show all address families by default.
> Furthermore, the behavior is totally bogus for different permutations of
> the command:
>
> ip route show : will show IPv4, not show IPv6
> ip route show table all : will show IPv4 and IPv6
> ip route -f link show : will show IPv4 and IPv6
>
> Rectify this behavior by removing some 2004 code that tries to munge the
> address family if it is unspecified and fails bad at guessing the user's
> intention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@...hlinux.org>
> ---
> ip/iproute.c | 3 ---
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ip/iproute.c b/ip/iproute.c
> index ca09029..4458d9c 100644
> --- a/ip/iproute.c
> +++ b/ip/iproute.c
> @@ -1236,9 +1236,6 @@ static int iproute_list_flush_or_save(int argc, char **argv, int action)
> argc--; argv++;
> }
>
> - if (do_ipv6 == AF_UNSPEC && filter.tb)
> - do_ipv6 = AF_INET;
> -
> ll_init_map(&rth);
>
> if (id || od) {
No, this will change the output for unsuspecting users and likely
break their scripts.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists