[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1314816361.6850.51.camel@moss-pluto>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:46:01 -0400
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: rongqing.li@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define security_sk_getsecctx
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:43 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 8/31/2011 1:36 AM, rongqing.li@...driver.com wrote:
> > From: Roy.Li <rongqing.li@...driver.com>
> >
> > Define security_sk_getsecctx to return the security
> > context of a sock.
>
> So, what is the intended use of the information
> coming from this hook? If I wanted to write the
> Smack hook, which of the "contexts" would I want
> to return? There are potentially three. If I know
> what the caller is looking for, I can (hopefully)
> select the correct information.
The initial use case is for netstat -Z so that it can reliably show the
security context of the socket rather than inferring it from the owning
process, which can be inaccurate for security-aware applications.
In your situation, when in != out, which would you rather see in netstat
-Z output? Alternatively, if you want them both, perhaps you could
combine in and out into a single string that is returned, similar to
what you proposed for handling multiple xattrs with inode_getsecctx()?
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists