netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 42132] New: Support BCM5750M in tg3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110902012514.GA5595@mcarlson.broadcom.com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Sep 2011 18:25:14 -0700
From:	"Matt Carlson" <mcarlson@...adcom.com>
To:	"Francesco Piccinno" <stack.box@...il.com>
cc:	"Matthew Carlson" <mcarlson@...adcom.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org" <bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org>,
	"Benjamin Li" <benli@...adcom.com>,
	"Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 42132] New: Support BCM5750M in tg3

Yes.  Sorry.  Please revert that patch.  If you really had a bcm5750,
you'd need to revert another patch too, but let's see where we stand
before going down that road.

On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 06:14:57PM -0700, Francesco Piccinno wrote:
> The only message I get regarding the firmware is the following:
> 
> [51503.038205] pci 0000:08:00.0: vpd r/w failed.  This is likely a
> firmware bug on this device.  Contact the card vendor for a firmware
> update.
> 
> Unfortunately I can not post the output of ethtool since the interface
> is not available. Shall I recompile the tg3 module with the proper
> patch and post the output?
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Francesco Piccinno
> 
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Matt Carlson <mcarlson@...adcom.com> wrote:
> > It's showing up on lspci as a PCIe device, so it can't be the 5750M.
> > The bcm5750M is a pci device.
> >
> > I'm wondering if bootcode is failing. ??Do you see any messages in your
> > syslogs that say "No firmware running"?
> >
> > Can you post the output of 'ethtool -i ethX'?
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 05:48:50PM -0700, Francesco Piccinno wrote:
> >> Yes sure.
> >>
> >> # lspci -vvv -s 08:00.0
> >> 08:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5750M
> >> Gigabit Ethernet
> >> ?? ?? ?? Subsystem: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5750M Gigabit Ethernet
> >> ?? ?? ?? Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
> >> Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
> >> ?? ?? ?? Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
> >> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
> >> ?? ?? ?? Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
> >> ?? ?? ?? Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 10
> >> ?? ?? ?? Region 0: Memory at f4100000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
> >> ?? ?? ?? Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME-
> >> ?? ?? ?? Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data
> >> pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Connection timed out
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Not readable
> >> ?? ?? ?? Capabilities: [58] MSI: Enable- Count=1/8 Maskable- 64bit+
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Address: 5149526521410124 ??Data: 8b60
> >> ?? ?? ?? Capabilities: [d0] Express (v1) Endpoint, MSI 00
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? DevCap: MaxPayload 512 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <4us, L1 unlimited
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ExtTag+ AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE- FLReset-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr+ TransPend-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s, Latency L0 <4us, L1 <64us
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk+
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive-
> >> BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
> >> ?? ?? ?? Capabilities: [100 v1] Advanced Error Reporting
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? UESta: ??DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF-
> >> MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? UEMsk: ??DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF-
> >> MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? UESvrt: DLP+ SDES- TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF+
> >> MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? CESta: ??RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? CEMsk: ??RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? AERCap: First Error Pointer: 00, GenCap+ CGenEn- ChkCap+ ChkEn-
> >> ?? ?? ?? Capabilities: [13c v1] Virtual Channel
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Caps: ?? LPEVC=0 RefClk=100ns PATEntryBits=1
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Arb: ?? ??Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Ctrl: ?? ArbSelect=Fixed
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Status: InProgress-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? VC0: ?? ??Caps: ?? PATOffset=00 MaxTimeSlots=1 RejSnoopTrans-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Arb: ?? ??Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128- TWRR128- WRR256-
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Ctrl: ?? Enable+ ID=0 ArbSelect=Fixed TC/VC=01
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Status: NegoPending- InProgress-
> >> ?? ?? ?? Capabilities: [160 v1] Device Serial Number 00-00-00-ff-fe-00-00-00
> >>
> >> Serial number is CND71700K6.
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >> Francesco Piccinno
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Matt Carlson <mcarlson@...adcom.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:40:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> (switched to email. ??Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> >> >> bugzilla web interface).
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:18:40 GMT
> >> >> bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42132
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??Summary: Support BCM5750M in tg3
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??Product: Drivers
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??Version: 2.5
> >> >> > ?? ?? Kernel Version: 3.0.3
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Platform: All
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? OS/Version: Linux
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Tree: Mainline
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Status: NEW
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Severity: normal
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Priority: P1
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? ??Component: Network
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? AssignedTo: drivers_network@...nel-bugs.osdl.org
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? ReportedBy: stack.box@...il.com
> >> >> > ?? ?? ?? ?? Regression: Yes
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I have a notebook (HP TC4400) which has a BCM5750 ethernet card inside. The
> >> >> > ouput of lspci is:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 08:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5750M
> >> >> > Gigabit Ethernet [14e4:167c]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Commit 67b284d476bcb3d100e946da23d6cf9acfd0465c removed the support for this
> >> >> > device.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> 67b284d476bcb3d100 says "These devices were never released to the public".
> >> >>
> >> >> > I wish to have the support for this network card back again. Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> oops ;)
> >> >
> >> > Really? ??All the TC4400 documentation I find says it uses a bcm5753M on a
> >> > PCIe bus. ??Can you post the full output of 'lspci -vvv -s 08:00.0' ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html