[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1314998599.3419.8.camel@bwh-desktop>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:23:19 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: carolyn.wyborny@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, 1/2] ethtool: Implement private flags interface for
ethtool application.
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 16:55 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:50:30 -0700
>
> > This patch completes the user space implementation of the private
> > flags inteface in ethtool. Using -b/-B options.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
>
> The only use case you show here is something generic which other
> chips have, Energy Efficient Ethernet.
>
> Making an attribute private which is present widely amonst various
> networking chips makes no sense at all.
>
> It deserved a generic ethtool flag.
I agree.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists