[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110905195714.GC29025@philter>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:57:14 +0200
From: Phil Sutter <phil.sutter@...rinet.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_packet: flush complete kernel cache in packet_sendmsg
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 06:28:50PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 02:46:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 13:08 +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > This flushes the cache before and after accessing the mmapped packet
> > > buffer. It seems like the call to flush_dcache_page from inside
> > > __packet_get_status is not enough on Kirkwood (or ARM in general).
> > > ---
> > > I know this is far from an optimal solution, but it's in fact the only working
> > > one I found.
> > [...]
> >
> > This is ridiculous. If flush_dcache_page() isn't doing everything it
> > should, you need to fix that.
>
> It does do everything it should - which is to perform maintanence on
> page cache pages. It flushes the kernel mapping of the page. It
> also flushes the userspace mappings of the page which it finds by
> walking the mmap list via the associated struct page. It does not
> touch vmalloc mappings because it has no way to know whether they
> exist or not.
>
> It doesn't do so much for anonymous pages - to do so would only
> duplicate what flush_anon_page() does at the very same callsites.
> Plus the mmap list isn't available for such pages so there's no
> way to find out what userspace addresses to flush.
Indeed very interesting information, thanks a lot!
The code in question uses __get_free_pages(), and if that fails uses
vmalloc() (see alloc_one_pg_vec_page() for reference). Both code paths
show result in the same faulty behaviour.
> If the AF_PACKET buffers are created from anonymous pages and it's
> using flush_dcache_page(), it's using the wrong interface.
So, in order to fix this, which alternative would you suggest? Quite a
lot of work has been done regarding memory allocation, so I guess
changing that side is a no-go.
Greetings, Phil
--
Viprinet GmbH
Mainzer Str. 43
55411 Bingen am Rhein
Germany
Zentrale: +49-6721-49030-0
Durchwahl: +49-6721-49030-134
Fax: +49-6721-49030-209
phil.sutter@...rinet.com
http://www.viprinet.com
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bingen am Rhein
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Mainz HRB40380
Geschäftsführer: Simon Kissel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists